Weekly Assignments
Weekly assignments include 10 reading reflections, 10 quizzes, and 2 discussion posts. Instructions for each assignment are outlined in Canvas under a specific assignment. These assignments should be written carefully, with attention paid to APA style and grammar (225 total points).
Writing Assignments
1. Check Your Own Personal Biases Assignment (20 pts)
Using APA guidelines (i.e., 1-inch margins, double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman), write a 2.5–3-page paper on your own possible biases. Choose two people: one whom you admire, and one you do not. These individuals can be family members, friends, or colleagues you know well.
Person you admire (1 page) (5 pts):
- Why do you admire that person? What qualities does that person possess? What draws you to that person?
- Aside from your admiration, has that person done anything wrong? Has their wrongdoing affected your relationship? Why or why not?
- Did you need to justify their wrongdoing, and if so, how have you justified that person’s wrongdoings? Explain.
Person you dislike (1 page) (5 pts):
- Why do you dislike this person? What qualities does this person possess that make you not want to be around them?
- What has this person done right in their life?
- Have you considered their good deeds to better your perception of them?
Reflection (1 page) (10 pts):
- What have you learned from this exercise?
- Do you think you had favorable biases toward the person you admire?
- Do you think you had unfavorable biases toward the person you dislike?
- Do you think it is possible to divorce your perception of a person from a person’s act? In other words, can you be unbiased?
2. Current Issue Debate (35 pts)
Choose a current family policy issue being debated or decided by government, advocacy groups, businesses, or nonprofits. Describe how this issue is being discussed through the lens of a liberal source and a conservative source. Write a 3 to 4-page analysis (third-person perspective) addressing:
- Describe what the issue is (2 pts) and explain why it is an issue (3 pts) — 5 total points.
- Locate a liberal source (name the source) and explain the issue from the liberal perspective (5 pts).
- Locate a conservative source (name the source) and explain the issue from the conservative perspective (5 pts).
- Comment on what both sources share in common, even if not explicit (7 pts).
- Suggest a compromised solution, specifying what each side would realistically give up toward a mutually agreeable solution (10 pts).
- Writing organization, spelling, grammar, composition, APA style (3 pts).
3. Letter to the Editor or Government Official (15 pts)
Write a 200-word letter to the editor or a government official expressing your personal view on a current family policy issue (you may use the issue analyzed for the Current Issue Debate or another issue).
- Write in journalistic style.
- Specify to whom you are sending the letter.
- If relevant, specify where the official’s take on the issue was aired/printed.
- If a letter is published or responded to, 5 points of extra credit will be assigned.
4. Diverse Views on a Controversial Family Policy (30 pts)
Prepare a typed 5- to 8-page paper (APA guidelines) demonstrating your understanding of the concerned/satisfied/impatient views and applying these concepts to a controversial family or social policy issue of your choice. Use only class readings to contrast perspectives and use the questions below as headings.
Grading rubric:
- Issue and controversy (2 pts): Clearly explain what is controversial about your chosen issue.
- Views of the issue (6 pts total):
- Concerned view (2 pts)
- Satisfied view (2 pts)
- Impatient view (2 pts)
- Underlying values (6 pts total):
- Values underlying the concerned position (2 pts)
- Values underlying the satisfied position (2 pts)
- Values underlying the impatient position (2 pts)
- Policy agendas (6 pts total):
- Policy agenda of the concerned position (2 pts)
- Policy agenda of the satisfied position (2 pts)
- Policy agenda of the impatient position (2 pts)
- Contributions using the theory of paradox (7 pts total):
- What is the theory of paradox? (1–2 sentences) (1 pt)
- What can the concerned position contribute to informing good policy? (2 pts)
- What can the satisfied position contribute to informing good policy? (2 pts)
- What can the impatient position contribute to informing good policy? (2 pts)
- Writing quality (4 pts): Organization, spelling, grammar, composition, APA style.
5. Report on Policy Meeting Attended (20 pts)
Attend a meeting (in-person) where issues impacting children and families are addressed (e.g., Utah legislative hearing; local/municipal government; Utah Supreme Court; advocacy group; political forum; nonprofit board). Write a 1.5-to-2.5-page report including:
- Name of group, location, and date of meeting (2 pts)
- Approximate number and types of people in attendance (2 pts)
- Total time you attended and whether this was the whole meeting (1 pt)
- Meeting agenda and whether it was summarized at the outset (1 pt)
- Interactional processes observed: control, public comment, emotional tone, decision-making (5 pts)
- Decisions made (if any) (2 pts)
- Implications of the meeting process or outcomes for families (3 pts)
- What you learned about the policymaking process and comparison to course content (3 pts)
- Attach a brochure/agenda or similar documentation with date/place (1 pt)
6. Evaluation of a Family Impact Analysis (30 pts)
A Family Impact Analysis (FIA) assesses how a policy or program may benefit or produce unintended negative consequences for families. The purpose of this assignment is NOT to conduct an FIA, but to critically evaluate an already completed FIA (assigned by the instructor). Write a 5- to 7-page paper evaluating how fully the assigned FIA addresses the Family Impact Checklist criteria (Bogenschneider, 2024, pp. 256–258).
Outline your evaluation as follows:
- Introduction to the issue and description of the policy/program addressed by the FIA (3 pts; ≤1 page)
- Family impact according to the five principles (15 pts total; 3 pts per principle): For each principle, identify:
- Aspects the FIA states support the principle (or note if not addressed)
- Aspects the FIA states undermine/do not support the principle (or note if not addressed)
- Your rating of how fully the analysis addressed the principle’s criteria (0%–100%) with reasons and what was missing
- Key points raised in the FIA across the five principles (4 pts), including at least two potentially beneficial and two potentially harmful effects to families that might have been overlooked without the FIA
- Overall quality of the FIA (5 pts): At least two strengths (including how it provides direction for improving policy/programs) and at least two weaknesses (e.g., overlooked principles/criteria)
- Writing quality (3 pts): Organization, spelling, grammar, composition, APA style
Grading
Grades will be assigned based on the following percentage of points earned:
Grade | Percentage | Grade | Percentage | Grade | Percentage | Grade | Percentage | Grade | Percentage
A | 94 – 100% | B+ | 87 – 89.9% | C+ | 77 – 79.9% | D+ | 67 – 69.9% | F | Below 60%
A- | 90 – 93.9% | B | 84 – 86.9% | C | 74 – 76.9% | D | 64 – 66.9% | |
B- | 80 – 83.9% | C- | 70 – 73.9% | D- | 60 – 63.9% | | | |
Please note: Grades will not be rounded up (e.g., 89.9% is a B, not an A).