AI is a tool we honestly don’t know a lot about yet, especially as it evolves so rapidly. Like all major changes in technology (the internet, smart phones), there are some who want it to be abolished, and others who are using it for everything. I’m not sure where I stand yet, and as such will list specific AI usage policies on the individual assignments. But to keep it simple, let’s be honest about everything we do for class.
What that said, there is some evidence from research that I’d like you to consider:
- Writing things down by hand, and thinking and discussing ideas leads to better learning than just typing or watching a video. Consider ditching the tech for old school pen and paper and maybe a discussion with a peer or mentor.
- The feeling of awe and accomplishment you get from walking/climbing up a mountain is much higher than if you are able to take a ride to the top of that same mountain. The discomfort, stress, sustained effort, and earned success sticks with you far longer and gives that experience a greater value. AI shortcuts may be similar according to this study.
- A study on using LLMs such as ChatGPT have found that “LLM users consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels. These results raise concerns about the long-term educational implications of LLM reliance and underscore the need for deeper inquiry into AI's role in learning.” article
How that relates to AI is that by taking shortcuts as a means to an end (a good grade in the case of college classes), or even as a way to make the process easier and more efficient, we are actually harming our ability to be resilient, anti-fragile, thoughtful, quick thinking, and empathetic humans, and these skills are SO important in Outdoor Rec.
AI is fairly ubiquitous these days, in Google Searches or using Canva to make a flyer. You may not even know AI algorithms are doing something in the background of your browser. That is different from copying an assignment’s instructions into AI with the intent to deceive. Use of generative AI as a means to complete assessments and assignments is Academic Misconduct under SUU Policy. 6.33. Any suspected use of AI to deceive or cheat will result in a zero on the assignment until we have a meeting to discuss. Egregious use of AI will result in a zero on the assignment as well as referral to academic integrity specialists on campus for academic misconduct violations, with all the possible consequences.
If you are anti-AI for ethical/environmental reasons, then you are certainly welcome to not utilize it at all, even when an assignment explicitly allows it.
TL:DR
IN GENERAL
If the assignment does not explicitly list specific expectations for AI Use, these general restrictions apply.
Allowed: Brainstorming ideas, checking grammar, summarizing long readings, asking for a skill to be explained a different way.
Never Allowed: Generating text for discussions, copying and pasting directly from AI outputs, solving problems through prompts without critical analysis, fabricating citations, utilizing AI as an attempt to cheat or deceive.